Divergent – Movie Review

Divergent Movie Poster-PromoBeatrice Prior must choose between working in the soup kitchen all her life or jumping out of trains while cheering like a twelve-year-old. She chooses trains.

Sorry, let’s try this again:

Based on Veronica Roth’s bestselling YA novel of the same name, Divergent (2014) is set in a dystopia where the city’s sixteen-year-olds undergo a test to determine which “faction” of society they are suited for. Beatrice Prior (Shailene Woodley) is told that her results show her as Divergent, meaning she has inclinations toward more than one faction. This, however, puts her in life in danger and she’s told to keep her Divergent-ness a secret.

As if that didn’t suck enough, Beatrice also has to choose between staying with her family in the boring, philanthropic Abnegation faction; or switching to a faction in which she might actually fit in. Beatrice chooses to move to Dauntless, the security and peacekeeping faction, and quickly takes a new name: Tris (she is brave, rational, and compassionate—not creative).

Little does Tris know, her move to Dauntless would throw her into a spiral of conspiracies and face-punching.

Awesome stuff about the film:

Though I read the novel and knew exactly what was going to happen, the film still managed to keep me somewhat interested throughout. Not super interested, mind you, but still interested enough to check my phone only three or four times.

Acting chops

Shailene Woodley does a good job being likable as Tris. The only issue I have with her performance is her delivery of a certain line as she pokes at some glass.

Theo James does a good job . . . being handsome. To be honest, there aren’t any standout (or horrible) performances that come to mind.

Better than the novel?

Notably, a particular dramatic scene involving a reluctant Tris and a rifle is much more compelling in the film than it was in the source material. A high five to Neil Burger and his team for that one.

Not-so-awesome stuff:

Christina is too short

Zoe Kravitz as Christina may have been a miscast. It’s not that she’s a bad actor, but just that the character of Christina is supposed to be much taller than Tris. Here, Woodley is 5’8″ and Kravitz is 5’2″ (this is James Marsden as Cyclops and Hugh Jackman as Wolverine all over again). Yeah, it’s mostly a superficial detail and does little to affect the story. Then again, in the novel, one of Christina’s few advantages as a fighter is that she has reach.

Tris Prior Training - Shailene Woodley

Tris isn’t throwing an elbow, that’s pretty much the Dauntless stance; they love being hit in the ribs.

Dauntless don’t know how to fight

Speaking of fighting, the combat in this movie isn’t entirely impressive. More than anything else, it’s very uncomfortable watching Tris get pummeled by people many times her size. I know it’s partially intended, but it just feels very wrong.

On top of that, the Dauntless fighting stance is a tad ludicrous. They don’t bother protecting their ribs (which is hand-to-hand 101). Also people whose lives revolve around fighting really shouldn’t have so many piercings. See The Punisher (2004) (where the dude with piercings gets them ripped off his face).

Still, it’s satisfying to see certain characters get their comeuppance.

Bit too many ups and downs

I don’t recall if the novel felt this way, but the movie did seem to have too many mini-climaxes. It kind of took the impact out of the ending.


Not bad. Watch it if you like any one of the following: the Divergent novels; Shailene Woodley; short people in roles meant for tall people.

14 thoughts on “Divergent – Movie Review

  1. Pingback: Divergent - Movie Review | Tinseltown Times

  2. I actually watched this movie on yesterday. I thought most of what you wrote here. I didn’t read the book first, but I plan to. I did notice that Kravitz was too short and Tris poking on the glass was odd. I thought the movie was a bit weird in the way that Tris brother in this movie was her partner in The Fault in our Stars. That threw me off a bit too. Other than that I thought the movie was good.
    Do you know if there’s going to be a sexual?


  3. Haha loved your initial synopsis! Yeah I feel like the movie was entertaining… It made more sense tho if you read the whole series. I watched it w someone who hasn’t read a book in years and he was so so confused the whole time. “Why is it bad to be brave and smart?” Needless to say I spoiled the big plot twist at the end of book 2 for him. Their society makes more sense if you have the right context..


  4. I saw this with my girlfriend because she loves the series, and I had never read it before so I had no clue what I was walking in to. But I loved the damn thing lol it was awesome, and the score was solid, too.

    We used to have the books but don’t anymore, so I’m going to buy the box set and read them.

    I was very surprised that this move was as good as it was, because I was expecting a cinematic turd.

    Good review.


  5. Agreed. Agreed. Check. Still liked the film. I watch films for children–and teens–the way children do. They notice that stuff, but they don’t care. That’s me.

    That puny girl would have been creamed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s